Bp. Morlino of Madison, WI, was on TWO with Ray Arroyo last night. His discussion was rather disappointing. He prefaced his remarks with the fact that he is not elected in any position to represent the USCCB. But, he was stuck on the 4 talking points about healthcare reform that the USCCB has put out, which really don't tell us much. He was also stuck on covering immigrants. He finally agreed, after repeated questioning from Ray, that this is an area of prudential judgment. Bp. Morlino talked about the possibility of setting up clinics to free up emergency rooms for emergencies.
No one is stopping Catholic hospital groups from doing this. Indeed, St E's has set up 2 "urgent care" facilities which take care of less severe needs in O'Fallon and Waterloo. Yet, I think the purpose is the geographic reach in that case. I recall walk-in clinics like this in Springfield, IL, and NoVa, when I lived in both places. As a young woman who didn't have a regular GP, I found them helpful and convenient on Saturdays and evenings. I guess they didn't make enough money. They seem to have gone by the wayside.
Bp. Morlino did acknowledge the idea of subsidiarity, but didn't have anything to say about whether a federal public option was a problem. He must not think so, which concerns me. He also did emphasize that the USCCB has not endorsed any bill in Congress. Even with Stupak, Morlino noted that the bill does not address the conscience or elder care concerns.
Ray didn't ask him whether he thought it just for the Congress to pass a law imposing jail time for those who do not purchase insurance, an extraordinary mandate in this formerly free nation.
As I said, talking points, generalities, little to no concern about federal control over families' rights. No outrage over the House bill.
Saturday, November 14, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
You are being a little harsh on Bishop Morlino, who has a history of speaking the Truth courageously, only to be abused by the media in extremely liberal Madison.
Bishop Morlino has been forced by Madison liberals to take a more cautious approach with the media.
To me, the interview you refer to sounded more like Ray Arroyo was trying to get sensational and emotional statements out of the Bishop (such as "torpedoing" the health care bill!), and he also interrupted the Bishop more than once, disconcerting him.
Bishop Morlino was right to be cautious. We are not trying to pick emotional public fights with our opposition, we are trying to win a war with wise and cautious strategy here.
God bless Bishop Morlino -- he is among the very best and faithful that we have. We should be standing behind him, not criticizing and analyzing him.
If they divide us, they conquer us. Cut the good Bishop some slack! He repeats what the Pope says, and in Madison, he has been crucified over and over for that. Allow him to be cautious and to avoid stirring up a media frenzy when he thinks that's appropriate.
Woops!
My bad.
I confused this week's Fox news interview of Bishop Morlino by Bill Hemmer with your report.
So I take back the paragraph about the specifics of the interview.
But all the comments regarding solidarity with our good Bishop Morlino still apply.
Thanks and God bless!
MC:
Thanks for the posts and information about Bp. Morlino's faithfulness. I did not see him w/Bill Hemmer this week. The bishop did seem like a thoughtful and serious man. I do wish the bishops understood better what is at stake with a "public option." They are not accountants, doctors, lawyers, or econimsts--at least few are if any--so, I know they're asked to consider many things not in their primary area of expertise. I wish they'd have better staff with a wider range of imagination to solve the problems that worry the bishops. I am tempted to suggest that the USCCB stay out of public policy except where Catholics' faith and the Church's freedom are at stake; but they should speak out about moral clarity in our culture, ie, marriage and so forth.
If the USCCB would adhere to the teachings of the Catholic Catechism then they would not need specific expertise in fields outside of their experience. It would be a unifying voice as well.
Ellen*
Post a Comment